home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Tue, 31 May 1994 19:57:32 -0400 (EDT)
- From: Timothy Miller <millert@undergrad.csee.usf.edu>
- Subject: Re: Colour.
- To: gem-list@world.std.com
- In-Reply-To: <9405312309.AA09551@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au>
- Message-Id: <Pine.3.87.9405311932.D27706-0100000@undergrad>
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
-
- On Wed, 1 Jun 1994, Warwick Allison wrote:
-
- > In message <199405310709.JAA01683@blade.stack.urc.tue.nl>, you wrote:
- >
- > >I favour a solution that is implemented as some sort of system
- > >extension.
- >
- > Yes, agreed. Of the three choices:
- >
- > 1. Set a std, apps must implement.
- > 2. Set a std, libs must implement.
- > 3. Set a std, tsr/acc must implement.
- >
- > Only (3) gives flexibility, etc.
- >
- > Of course, libraries would provide an interface to the tsr/acc.
- >
- >
- > --
- > Warwick
- >
- I vote #3, definately. Not only does it make it possible to deal even
- with programs that never knew about our standard, but it's easy to
- upgrade and doesn't result in redundant code.
-
-
-